After touring the White House in the morning, this afternoon the 2009 St. Albans School of Public Service class visited the Cato Institute, a leading American private, non-profit public policy institute -- also known as a "think tank." Our host at Cato, Vice President of Research Brink Lindsey (see photo at left), is an expert in trade policy and the author of a number of books, including a well-regarded social history of America after World War II, The Age of Abundance: How Prosperity Transformed America's Politics and Culture. Mr. Lindsey has appeared on CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, and the BBC, and, perhaps most impressively to our students, on Jon Stewart's The Daily Show.Mr. Lindsey explained that Cato is known as a Libertarian think tank, and then spoke about what both those terms mean. He said that working at a think tank is a cross between being a professor with no students and a lobbyist with no clients. Think tanks such as the Cato Institute seek to influence changes in public policy through the promulgation and dissemination of ideas. The "Libertarian" label can be somewhat harder to define, but Mr. Lindsey explained it as, generally, a belief in the primacy of individual rights, and the conviction that a free market, smaller government, and fewer government regulations, whether social or economic, help lead to greater individual freedom. Libertarians of the variety found at Cato believe that small government and free market policies provide an institutional framework best designed to advance individual freedoms. Mr. Lindsey spoke wryly of the "freedom of powerlessness"--as a think tank seeking to influence through ideas, but not an institution exercising direct control over policy such as Congress or the Presidency, Cato can be free not to follow the agenda of either of the two major political parties in America. Consequently, its policies may line up with Republicans on some issues, such as economic and/or free trade policies, but then be more in line with the Democratic Party on certain social issues. Cato itself is resolutely non-partisan, and Mr. Lindsey said this integrity in terms of non-alignment with political parties has been a key to Cato's ability to be heard by those on all parts of the political spectrum.
Our group was interested in examples of public policies that Cato had influenced. Mr. Lindsey said that it can be a difficult task to trace the genesis of a public policy idea--perhaps a junior staffer reads a Cato paper, and 10 years later is a senior staffer to an important Congressperson, who then becomes interested in that idea--it would be hard to trace a link back to Cato. In some cases, however, the link is clear. One example is the proposed immigration reform bill in 2008, which can be traced back to Cato papers on immigration reform. Mr. Lindsey noted that the immigration legislation did not pass, and that sometimes it may take a generation for an idea to gain a foothold in actual policy terms.
Mr. Lindsey noted that think tanks such as Cato employ a range of people, including recent college graduates, and has a very strong internship program as well. Our students left with a better understanding of that peculiarly American institution, the think tank, and a recognition that this was another way to participate in the public discourse.















